Mexican's Protest Against President Bush's Visit

I was watching the news on a local NBC TV station this AM in the LA area. I guess it wasn't really much of a surprise to see how some of the people of Mexico view our President (he's referred to as Hitler) and our country. I took the time to search the web, and found the following reported from the Latin News Media, Prensa Latina:

Mexican University students and social organizations continue protesting US President George W. Bush s visit.

"Mexico refuses to receive Bush the murderer," reiterated hundreds of people gathered in a march at the central avenues of Merida city, Yucatan state, 234 miles from this capital.

The demonstrators have chanted slogans for the respect of the country s sovereignty and against Iraq war for three days consecutively.

Freedom is a privilege. We often forget how much it means. Here, in this country, the illegals are demanding a free pass to this country. They want citizenship for being here, free medical care, free education for their children, voting rights, welfare, etc.

Yet, Bush goes to Mexico, and they call him a Hitler, burn the flag, and trash the places where he was staying while in "their" country. Make you wonder!

President Bush Delivers State of the Union Address

Last night President Bush gave his 6th State of the Union Address. He was a class act, in my opinion, in honoring Nancy Pelosi as "Madam Speaker", as well as the "Democratic Majority". He could have bypassed either or both comments, but chose to recognize the changes that have taken place in our government.

His speech writer's did a good job in the manner in which he presented the points he wanted to hit on. Buried well into the body of his close to an hour presentation was the Iraq war and what he planned on doing.

I hope he will be able to accomplish many of the things he set out as opportunities for the next two years. We do not need this President to become a "lame duck".

His approach was most likely cautious, but noteworthy....a quote from the opening of his speech so indicates...."We are not the first to come here with government divided and uncertainty in the air. Like many before us, we can work through our differences, and achieve big things for the American people. "

He wants to concentrate on balancing the budget(without increasing taxes), fix Medicare and Medicaid and save Social Security, establish a legal and orderly path for foreign workers to enter our country to work on a temporary basis, fuel reduction and alternate fuel development, and to continue to protect the people of this country from danger.

So, how did he do? I think he did well, considering what he had to work with, but to hear the news media, well, you'd have to say he failed, has no support, and will go down as one of the most unfavorable Presidents, being linked with Jimmy Carter and Dick Nixon.

Many of the areas he wants to concentrate on here, locally, are areas that I'm sure he hopes the Democrats will embrace. While they are important, they mean nothing if we are not safe. I'll not dwell on them now. The war in Iraq is the prime point. How the nation (congress and senate) react and choose to follow or attempt to derail what the President proposed will, in effect, determine our futures.

The President stated...."This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we are in. Every one of us wishes that this war were over and won. Yet it would not be like us to leave our promises unkempt, our friends abandoned, and our own security at risk. "

He has offered his plan on building up the troop level both in Iraq and for the nation to add 90K+ to the armed forces over the next few years. All he asks is for a chance.....will he get it?

The news media this morning said No! I listened to the Democratic reply last night. They stated that both the majority of the Nation and the Military are against the war. If the President did not go along with that vision, that they'd show him the way! One local TV channel interviewed college students. One said the President needed to follow the will of the people. Another said he only spoke to satisfy the Democrats and what they wanted to hear. Another said how the President should have been more forceful in his presentation, seeing the position he holds. Only one of the people interviewed sided with the President, a marine, who said he believed we needed to finish the job in Iraq. The President's approval rating is about 28%....was what I saw on TV this AM planned to show that approval rating?

So, what do you think about the President's speech? Did he do a good job? Is he being honest? Will he get support from the crongress and/or the senate? Give me your feedback here....let's hear from you!

Iraq - Troop Build Up In Question

It's all over the news....blogs, newspapers, the Internet, TV....President Bush has gone against what the public (and the majority of the Democratic Party) seemingly want....a troop reduction and ultimate pullout of the U.S. Military.

So, who is right? Is the President best equipped with the correct information to make the decision on what to do in Iraq, or is the news media, who is "supposedly" quoting the public, got the "right stuff" to make the call?

What do you think? You've got the opportunity to be heard. Just reply to the blog. Let everyone else see what you feel about one of the most important events of our present day.

I personally think that we need to fight radical Islam in the middle east. If we get out now, or too soon, withdraw our troops, then they've won. They'll bring it here, believe me. This particular sect of Islam maybe the minority, but many of the majority are afraid to speak out for fear of retaliation....the result is likely disastrous.

The side that wants withdrawal offer no plan to win. They've chosen to lose. This will be worse than Vietnam. When a time comes again (and it will), when American needs assistance from other "free" nations, they'll think twice about helping, if we pull out before the job is done.

I've heard on at least one radio station that most Americans have forgot, or put to the back of our minds, what happened on 9/11/01. The radio host went on to say that it'll take another attack on America for us to "wake up". The next event will more likely than not be larger than the last. Los Angeles, Seattle, Chicago....who's going to be the target?

Now, the Democratic Party (and a few Republicans) want to withold funding for the military. They want to tie the President's hands and force the issue of withdrawal of our troops from Iraq. I feel for the families of those who have members service in our armed forces, but what if our founding father's were to face the same events then as we are today....is withdrawal before victory the way to go?

Ford Critical of Iraq

Boy, if you ever doubted that the news media was against Bush and the Iraq war, it should be crystal clear now!

Would the interview ever have been published if President Ford would have agreed with what Bush and his staff are doing on the Iraq war?

Gerry Ford passed away the day after Christmas. Funeral plans have yet to be completed. Betty, his wife, has not been seen or given any "live" comments about her 50+ years of marriage, but Bob Woordward sure lets us know what President Ford thinks about how the present President Bush is handling things on the "Washington Post" website today.

The following is quoted from the Austrailian "Hearld Sun" posted to the web several hours ago.

"US President George W. Bush and his top advisers made a "big mistake" in their justification for invading Iraq, Gerald Ford told journalist Bob Woodward in an interview embargoed until after the former president's death.

Ford, who died on Tuesday at his home in California, aged 93, said he would not have gone to war, based on what was known publicly at the time, said the report on The Washington Post website today.

“I don't think, if I had been president, on the basis of the facts as I saw them publicly, I don't think I would have ordered the Iraq war,” Ford said.

“I would have maximized our effort through sanctions, through restrictions, whatever, to find another answer.”

In a four-hour tape-recorded interview in July 2004, Ford “very strongly” disagreed with the justification for the 2003 invasion of Iraq advocated and carried out by key Bush advisers and veterans of his own administration – Vice President Dick Cheney and former Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld – reported Woodward.

“Rumsfeld and Cheney and the President made a big mistake in justifying going into the war in Iraq. They put the emphasis on weapons of mass destruction,” Ford said.

“And now, I've never publicly said I thought they made a mistake, but I felt very strongly it was an error in how they should justify what they were going to do.”

The Bush administration's initial justification for the war was that Iraq posed a threat because it had stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. None were found."

I'm sure you'll find many more articles on the web, in the papers and all over TV. I was watching the morning news at 7AM, when I found out what was going on with the Ford inverview that Bob Woodward had and promised to keep "quiet" until his death.

I'm not happy with the way the war effort is going in Iraq, but would it be better to pull the troops out and fight the war here at home?